Phoenix New Media Ltd
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▼ -83.1% over 5Y.
today you would have $186.20▼ -81.4%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 4 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $1.67 | $2.37 | $1.36 | $2.68 | |
| P/S | 1.6x | 1.3x | 1.9x | 1.1x | 2.0x |
| P/B | 1.0x | 0.8x | 1.2x | 0.6x | 1.2x |
| EPS | $0.00 | -$4.32 | -$8.64 | -$9.12 | |
| Profit margin | -10.78% | 0.04% |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
Square root of 22.5 × earnings × book value — the two ceilings Graham proposed. Blind to intangibles, so it undervalues software and brands.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Median P/E of 15.7 among peers in the sector.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Companies of similar size in Communication Services, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSGMMotorsport Games Inc. | $3.89 | 13.0x | 4.2x | — | 51.40% | $17.85M |
| NIXXNixxy, Inc. | $0.64 | — | 2.2x | — | -100.42% | $18.36M |
| UONEKUrban One Inc | $4.20 | — | 0.8x | — | -129.34% | $19.38M |
| GIGMGIGAMEDIA Ltd | $1.48 |
Phoenix New Media Limited provides content through an integrated Internet platform in the People's Republic of China. It operates in two segments, Net Advertising Services and Paid Services. The company provides various interest-based content verticals, such as news, military affairs, technology, finance, entertainment, sports, automobiles, digital reading, fashion, and history; and interactive services, including comment postings and user surveys. It also provides mobile newspaper and mobile video services, as well as e-commerce and wireless value-added services. In addition, the company's mobile channel comprises ifeng News that provides newsfeeds and other content in the form of text, images, live streaming, and video; ifeng Video, a video application, which offers video news, livestreaming, Phoenix TV programs content, etc.; i.ifeng.com mobile Internet website; and digital reading applications. It offers content and services through PC, mobile, and third-party channels, as well as transmits content primarily through Phoenix TV to TV viewers. Phoenix New Media Limited was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China. Phoenix New Media Limited is a subsidiary of Phoenix Satellite Television (B.V.I.) Holding Limited.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| -7.61% |
| -14.81% |
| -13.96% |
| ROE | -6.43% | 0.03% | -4.56% | -8.37% | -8.31% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
2 methods answered, across 1 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
+448.5% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| — |
| 0.4x |
| — |
| -5.10% |
| $16.36M |
| CDLXCardlytics, Inc. | $3.44 | — | — | — | -513.16% | $20.26M |
| MPUMega Matrix Inc | $0.22 | — | 0.8x | — | -213.15% | $15.79M |