Loading…
Kaltura Inc
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▼ -86.1% over 5Y.
today you would have $127.79▼ -87.2%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 5 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $1.64 | $2.20 | $1.95 | $1.72 | $3.37 | |
| P/E | — | — | — | — | — | 3.5x |
| P/S | 1.6x | 1.3x | 1.9x | 1.6x | 1.4x | 2.6x |
| P/B | 9.2x | 38.5x | 13.9x | 9.2x | 5.3x | 5.0x |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Cash flow growing 5.0% a year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, then 2.5% forever.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Companies of similar size in Technology, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILCSilicom Ltd | $42.20 | — | 2.1x | — | -8.28% | $242.55M |
| IMMRImmersion Corp | $7.43 | 21.9x | 0.8x | 4.04% | 3.33% | $246.72M |
| ZSQRZ Squared Inc. | $4.54 | — | — | — | — | $240.62M |
| ALMUAeluma, Inc. | $13.14 | — |
Kaltura, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides various software-as-a-service (SaaS) products and solutions and a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and internationally. The company operates through two segments, Enterprise, Education, and Technology (EE&T); and Media and Telecom (M&T). The company creates, generates, manages, analyzes, distributes, publishes, and engages with live, real-time, and on-demand videos, and other forms; media content creation tools, AI-assisted and AI-generated content capabilities, content enrichment and repurposing, centralized content management, publishing, analytics, and content lifecycle management; and experience components, including live, real-time and on-demand video, audience interaction, moderation, analytics, and post-event content reuse. It offers cloud-based software systems designed for over-the-top and cloud television services. The company was incorporated in 2006 and is headquartered in New York, New York.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| EPS | -$0.08 | -$0.21 | -$0.34 | -$0.53 | $0.95 |
| Profit margin | -26.47% | -6.67% | -17.52% | -26.47% | -40.57% | -35.97% |
| ROE | -152.92% | -190.65% | -128.41% | -152.92% | -158.02% | -69.60% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
1 methods answered, across 1 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
-5.1% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| 5.9x |
| — |
| -20.67% |
| $240.53M |
| QMLSQumulusAI, Inc. | $7.16 | — | — | — | -492.33% | $239.56M |
| AUDCAudiocodes Ltd | $10.41 | 41.6x | 1.8x | 3.84% | 4.23% | $251.43M |