Loading…
GLADSTONE LAND Corp
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
None of the investors we track reported a position in LAND.
▼ -57.2% over 5Y.
today you would have $509.79▼ -49.0%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 13 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $9.15 | $10.85 | $14.45 | $18.35 | $33.76 | $14.64 | $12.97 | $11.48 | $13.43 | $11.24 | $8.65 | $10.70 | $16.20 | |
| P/E | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Companies of similar size in Real Estate, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPIOffice Properties Income Trust | $17.68 | — | 0.8x | — | -135.72% | $388.14M |
| NREFNexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. | $17.24 | 7.4x | 0.9x | 11.60% | 14.87% | $397.11M |
| CHCTCommunity Healthcare Trust Inc | $14.27 | 21.3x | 0.9x | 12.33% | 4.92% | $407.72M |
| FRPHFrp Holdings Inc |
Gladstone Land is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns farmland and farm-related properties located in major agricultural markets in the U.S. The Company currently owns 142 farms, comprised of approximately 98,000 acres in 14 different states and nearly 56,000 acre-feet (or over 18.1 billion gallons) of water assets in California. Gladstone Land's farms are predominantly located in regions where its tenants are able to grow fresh produce annual row crops, such as berries and vegetables, which are generally planted and harvested annually. The Company also owns farms growing permanent crops, such as almonds, blueberries, figs, olives, pistachios, and wine grapes, which are generally planted every 20-plus years and harvested annually. Gladstone Land pays monthly distributions to its stockholders and has paid 162 consecutive monthly cash distributions on its common stock since its initial public offering in January 2013. The current per-share distribution on its common stock is 0.0467 dollar per month, or 0.5604 dollar per year. Gladstone Land Corporation was established in 1997 and was incorporated in Maryland.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| — |
| 76.5x |
| — |
| 281.0x |
| 123.6x |
| — |
| — |
| P/S | 6.9x | 4.3x | 4.6x | 5.7x | 7.3x | 15.3x | 6.9x | 6.8x | 5.7x | 7.4x | 6.5x | 7.3x | 11.5x | 26.2x |
| P/B | 1.1x | 0.6x | 0.6x | 0.7x | 0.9x | 2.0x | 1.0x | 1.0x | 1.2x | 1.7x | 1.5x | 1.1x | 1.4x | 2.2x |
| EPS | -$0.29 | -$0.29 | -$0.28 | -$0.43 | -$0.29 | -$0.20 | -$0.13 | $0.15 | $0.00 | $0.04 | $0.07 | -$0.02 | -$0.20 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 6.16% | 5.20% | 3.82% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.69% | 4.12% | 4.60% | 3.91% | 4.40% | 5.38% | 3.36% | 9.20% |
| Payout | 664.29% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 352.00% | — | 1237.50% | 664.29% | — | — |
| Profit margin | 4.78% | 15.31% | 15.60% | 16.11% | 5.28% | 4.64% | 8.64% | 4.28% | 7.17% | -0.12% | 2.59% | 4.78% | -1.74% | -30.33% |
| ROE | 0.64% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 2.02% | 0.64% | 0.60% | 1.28% | 0.63% | 1.49% | -0.03% | 0.58% | 0.73% | -0.21% | -2.52% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
Dividend growing 4.2% a year against a 9.3% required return, taken from the stock’s beta. The only method anchored on what the company pays rather than what it reports.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
1 methods answered, across 1 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
+26.6% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| $22.18 |
| 2218.0x |
| 1.0x |
| — |
| -0.12% |
| $425.82M |
| AIVApartment Investment & Management Co | $2.18 | 21.8x | 0.8x | — | 9.65% | $336.32M |
| PINEAlpine Income Property Trust, Inc. | $17.33 | 82.5x | 0.9x | 6.98% | 2.30% | $326.58M |