Loading…
STUDIO CITY INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS Ltd
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
None of the investors we track reported a position in MSC.
▼ -89.3% over 5Y.
today you would have $107.71▼ -89.2%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 4 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $3.55 | $5.65 | $6.48 | $5.96 | |
| P/S | 9.0x | 3.9x | 6.8x | 11.2x | 397.6x |
| P/B | 6.0x | 4.8x | 6.7x | 6.8x | 5.2x |
| EPS | -$0.30 | -$0.50 | -$0.69 | -$1.84 | |
| Profit margin | -22.55% | -8.46% |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Cash flow growing 5.0% a year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, then 2.5% forever.
Sector median of 9.8x operating profit, less net debt. Sees the business before its financing, so debt does not distort the comparison. Banks have no EBITDA — interest is their revenue, not a cost.
Companies of similar size in Consumer Cyclical, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVEOCiveo Corp | $33.12 | — | 2.3x | — | -7.18% | $342.36M |
| RCKYRocky Brands Inc | $45.15 | 11.9x | 1.3x | 1.51% | 11.48% | $338.26M |
| CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc. | $5.39 | — | 1.4x | — | -26.53% | $344.03M |
| FLXSFlexsteel Industries Inc | $84.16 |
Studio City International Holdings Limited provides provision of services pursuant to a casino contract and the hospitality business in Macau. It operates gaming services, a casino contract for the operation of studio city casino, focusing on mass market and premium mass market table games and gaming machines, including baccarat, three-card baccarat, blackjack, craps, caribbean stud poker, roulette, sic bo, fortune 3 card poker, and other games; hospitality services; dining services; event and convention services; other services; leasing services; and resort, which offers various non-gaming attractions, including figure-8 ferris wheel, nightclub and karaoke venue, live performance arena, and an outdoor and indoor water park, as well as live performance arena and various food and beverage establishments, and retail space. The company was formerly known as Cyber One Agents Limited and changed its name to Studio City International Holdings Limited in January 2012. The company was founded in 2000 and is based in Central, Hong Kong. Studio City International Holdings Limited is a subsidiary of MCO Cotai Investments Limited.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| -15.13% |
| -29.97% |
| -2826.91% |
| ROE | -16.64% | -10.25% | -14.96% | -18.32% | -37.26% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
2 methods answered, across 2 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
-51.4% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| 13.9x |
| 2.6x |
| 1.19% |
| 21.99% |
| $344.36M |
| NEGGNewegg Commerce, Inc. | $16.70 | 64.2x | 2.1x | — | 3.94% | $350.27M |
| HLLYHolley Inc. | $2.92 | 32.4x | 0.8x | — | 2.33% | $354M |