Loading…
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Ltd
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
None of the investors we track reported a position in NCI.
▼ -71.2% over 5Y.
This stock has less than 5 years of price history — the answer would measure a shorter period than the one asked for.
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 2 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $9.04 | $26.40 | |
| P/E | — | — | 1.6x |
| P/S | — | 0.0x | 0.1x |
| P/B | — | 0.1x | 0.2x |
| EPS | — | $16.48 | |
| Profit margin | — | 0.24% | 3.42% |
| ROE | — |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
Square root of 22.5 × earnings × book value — the two ceilings Graham proposed. Blind to intangibles, so it undervalues software and brands.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Median P/E of 17.9 among peers in the sector.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Sector median of 9.8x operating profit, less net debt. Sees the business before its financing, so debt does not distort the comparison. Banks have no EBITDA — interest is their revenue, not a cost.
Companies of similar size in Consumer Cyclical, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNTYCentury Casinos Inc | $1.16 | — | — | — | -676.08% | $32.5M |
| NOMANomadar Corp. | $2.13 | — | 3.1x | — | -39.56% | $32.55M |
| WKHSWorkhorse Group Inc. | $3.07 | — | 1.2x | — | — | $33.55M |
| CRWSCrown Crafts Inc | $2.87 |
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited provides one-stop apparel solutions in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company offers a suite of services in the apparel supply chain, including market trend analysis, product design and development, raw material sourcing, production and quality control, and logistics management services. It also sells knitwear and apparel products under the les 100 ciels brand through digital and physical retail stores, as well as third-party online platforms. The company serves brand owners, apparel sourcing agents, and online fashion retailers. Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited was incorporated in 2021 and is based in Kwun Tong, Hong Kong.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| 0.59% |
| 14.19% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
3 methods answered, across 2 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
+130.7% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| 6.4x |
| 0.8x |
| 11.15% |
| 12.82% |
| $30.88M |
| SMJFSMJ International Holdings Inc. | $1.11 | — | 2.1x | — | -6.96% | $30.75M |
| DXLGDestination Xl Group Inc | $0.62 | — | 0.3x | — | -32.81% | $34.27M |