Loading…
Solesence Inc
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▼ -74.2% over 5Y.
today you would have $301.24▼ -69.9%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 16 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $1.60 | $2.44 | $0.60 | $1.13 | $4.40 | $0.85 | $0.28 | $0.73 | $0.52 | $0.72 | $0.40 | $0.40 | $0.54 | $0.34 | $0.41 | $1.21 | |
| P/E | 57.4x |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Sector median of 10.4x operating profit, less net debt. Sees the business before its financing, so debt does not distort the comparison. Banks have no EBITDA — interest is their revenue, not a cost.
Companies of similar size in Consumer Defensive, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOFBranchOut Food Inc. | $3.96 | — | 13.6x | — | -202.60% | $63.9M |
| IHiHuman Inc. | $1.25 | 6.0x | 0.4x | — | 7.73% | $63.89M |
| SOWGSow Good Inc. | $3.16 | — | — | — | -82.35% | $63.52M |
| WYHGWing Yip Food Holdings Group Ltd | $4.94 |
Solesence, Inc., a science-driven company, provides engineered materials, formulation development, and commercial manufacturing services in the United States. The company engages in the manufacture and supply of surface engineered zinc oxide and titanium dioxide ingredients. It also provides skin care formulations with mineral-based UV protection enabled by proprietary active pharmaceutical ingredients; and skin health products, such as sunscreens and daily care products. The company sells products in various markets, including medical diagnostics, architectural coatings, industrial coating applications, abrasion-resistant additives, and plastics additives applications. It serves skin health, beauty, and wellness sectors. The company was formerly known as Nanophase Technologies Corporation and changed its name to Solesence, Inc. in March 2025. Solesence, Inc. was incorporated in 1989 and is headquartered in Romeoville, Illinois.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| 80.0x |
| 34.9x |
| — |
| — |
| 88.0x |
| 28.3x |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| P/S | 1.6x | 1.8x | 3.3x | 0.9x | 1.5x | 7.3x | 1.9x | 0.9x | 1.7x | 1.4x | 2.1x | 1.2x | 1.2x | 1.6x | 1.0x | 0.9x | 2.7x |
| P/B | 6.7x | 6.4x | 11.4x | 17.3x | 9.9x | 28.8x | 11.9x | 7.1x | 17.9x | 5.4x | 8.1x | 4.4x | 3.0x | 2.9x | 1.3x | 1.2x | 2.5x |
| EPS | $0.02 | $0.07 | -$0.09 | -$0.05 | $0.05 | $0.03 | -$0.08 | -$0.06 | -$0.03 | -$0.04 | -$0.04 | -$0.06 | -$0.09 | -$0.10 | -$0.16 | -$0.19 |
| Profit margin | -11.83% | 2.88% | 8.09% | -11.77% | -7.03% | 7.87% | 5.78% | -24.03% | -14.66% | -6.33% | -11.90% | -11.56% | -17.38% | -25.84% | -23.84% | -34.85% | -43.10% |
| ROE | -43.28% | 10.15% | 28.34% | -230.81% | -46.43% | 31.08% | 36.20% | -198.94% | -150.36% | -24.41% | -45.97% | -41.66% | -44.90% | -46.16% | -31.50% | -44.99% | -39.05% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
1 methods answered, across 1 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
-81.0% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| 9.7x |
| 0.3x |
| — |
| 3.74% |
| $62.15M |
| SKILSkillsoft Corp. | $6.93 | — | — | — | — | $62.14M |
| LFVNLifevantage Corp | $6.22 | 15.5x | 2.3x | 3.22% | 14.87% | $78.31M |