Loading…
Transact Technologies Inc
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▼ -65.5% over 5Y.
today you would have $350.36▼ -65.0%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 17 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $4.00 | $4.09 | $6.98 | $6.32 | $10.90 | $7.10 | $10.97 | $8.98 | $13.25 | $6.60 | $8.59 | $5.47 | $12.53 | $7.22 | $7.26 | $9.42 | $6.94 | |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Cash flow growing 5.0% a year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, then 2.5% forever.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Companies of similar size in Technology, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIDRAEye, Inc. | $1.15 | — | 0.8x | — | -89.28% | $53.46M |
| AIOSAIOS Tech Inc. | $16.65 | — | 0.9x | — | -207.31% | $53.95M |
| ELTKEltek Ltd | $8.07 | — | 1.2x | 2.35% | -13.79% | $54.24M |
| VHCVirnetX Holding Corp | $12.12 | — |
TransAct Technologies Incorporated designs, develops, and markets transaction-based and specialty printers and terminals in the United States and internationally. It offers thermal printers and terminals to generate labels, coupons, and transaction records, such as receipts, tickets, and other documents. The company also provides consumable products, including POS receipt paper, ribbons, and other printing supplies, as well as replacement parts and accessories; and maintenance and repair services. In addition, it offers EPICENTRAL print system, a software solution that enables casino operators to create promotional coupons and marketing messages, and print them at the slot machine; and technical support services, as well as spare parts and accessories. Further, the company provides BOHA! terminal that combines hardware and software components in a device that includes an operating system, touchscreen, and one or two thermal print mechanisms. It markets its products under the TransAct, BOHA!, AccuDate, Epic, Ithaca, and EPICENTRAL brands for food service technology, point of sale automation, and casino and gaming markets. The company sells its products to original equipment manufacturers, value-added resellers, and distributors, as well as directly to end-users through its webstore transactsupplies.com. The company was incorporated in 1996 and is headquartered in Hamden, Connecticut.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| P/E |
| 22.0x |
| — |
| — |
| 14.9x |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 156.7x |
| 12.8x |
| 31.5x |
| 14.0x |
| 22.0x |
| — |
| 22.0x |
| 18.0x |
| 14.8x |
| 23.0x |
| 30.2x |
| P/S | 1.1x | 0.8x | 1.0x | 1.0x | 1.1x | 2.7x | 2.1x | 1.8x | 1.2x | 1.8x | 0.8x | 1.1x | 0.8x | 1.7x | 0.9x | 1.0x | 1.4x | 1.1x |
| P/B | 2.1x | 1.3x | 1.3x | 1.8x | 1.9x | 2.8x | 2.1x | 3.2x | 2.4x | 3.8x | 2.0x | 2.6x | 1.7x | 3.2x | 1.9x | 1.9x | 2.9x | 2.5x |
| EPS | -$0.12 | -$0.99 | $0.47 | -$0.60 | -$0.43 | -$0.72 | $0.07 | $0.70 | $0.42 | $0.47 | $0.39 | -$0.29 | $0.57 | $0.40 | $0.49 | $0.41 | $0.23 |
| Dividend yield | 3.50% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.28% | 4.01% | 2.64% | 4.85% | 3.73% | 5.67% | 2.15% | 0.83% | — | — | — |
| Payout | 68.09% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 514.29% | 51.43% | 83.33% | 68.09% | 82.05% | — | 47.37% | 15.00% | — | — | — |
| Profit margin | 5.18% | -2.41% | -22.73% | 6.54% | -10.21% | -10.26% | -18.40% | 1.13% | 9.94% | 5.70% | 6.32% | 5.18% | -4.56% | 8.21% | 5.29% | 7.09% | 6.18% | 3.67% |
| ROE | 10.85% | -3.99% | -32.20% | 12.05% | -17.53% | -10.37% | -18.69% | 1.99% | 19.68% | 12.34% | 15.00% | 12.02% | -9.53% | 15.17% | 10.85% | 13.24% | 12.54% | 8.12% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
Dividend growing 4.9% a year against a 10.1% required return, taken from the stock’s beta. The only method anchored on what the company pays rather than what it reports.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
2 methods answered, across 2 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
+106.6% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| — |
| — |
| -82.13% |
| $51.11M |
| ACFNAcorn Energy Inc | $19.73 | 34.0x | 5.6x | — | 19.87% | $50.01M |
| QTEXQTREX Quantum Ltd. | $0.83 | — | 12.8x | — | -397.89% | $55.94M |