Techprecision Corp
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▼ -34.2% over 5Y.
today you would have $664.14▼ -33.6%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 16 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $5.26 | $4.83 | $3.65 | $5.18 | $8.28 | $8.12 | $5.48 | $7.00 | $3.92 | $2.56 | $2.08 | $0.72 | $0.48 | $4.64 | $4.84 | $3.60 | |
| P/E | 35.8x |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Sector median of 12.6x operating profit, less net debt. Sees the business before its financing, so debt does not distort the comparison. Banks have no EBITDA — interest is their revenue, not a cost.
Companies of similar size in Industrials, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGSFBGSF Inc | $5.37 | — | 1.2x | — | -11.16% | $57.56M |
| WFCFWhere Food Comes From, Inc. | $11.60 | 40.0x | 6.5x | — | 15.41% | $57.76M |
| NMADNomad Power Solutions Inc | $3.60 | — | 2.3x | — | — | $57.96M |
| APWCAsia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd | $1.41 |
TechPrecision Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells precision, fabricated, and machined metal structural components and systems in the United States. It operates through two segments, Ranor and Stadco. The company offers custom components for U.S. Navy submarines and aircraft carriers, USMC military helicopters, and defense and aerospace programs. It also provides custom solutions, such as manufacturing engineering; materials management and traceability; high-precision heavy fabrication, including cutting, press and roll forming, welding, heat treating, assembly, blasting, and painting; high-precision machining, including CNC programming, finishing, and assembly; QC inspection services, which include fixed and portable CMM and nondestructive testing; and final packaging. It serves the defense, aerospace, and precision industrial markets. TechPrecision Corporation is headquartered in Westminster, Massachusetts.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 812.0x |
| — |
| 175.0x |
| — |
| 14.2x |
| 41.6x |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 30.0x |
| P/S | 2.8x | 1.7x | 1.4x | 1.0x | 1.4x | 12.7x | 15.4x | 10.0x | 12.3x | 6.0x | 4.0x | 3.4x | 1.0x | 0.6x | 2.9x | 2.7x | 1.7x |
| P/B | 9.2x | 6.9x | 5.4x | 4.1x | 3.1x | 18.6x | 24.1x | 17.0x | 21.1x | 14.1x | 9.3x | 32.9x | 61.6x | 3.4x | 9.2x | 7.4x | 4.0x |
| EPS | -$0.17 | -$0.29 | -$0.81 | -$0.11 | -$0.04 | $0.01 | -$0.01 | $0.04 | -$0.01 | $0.18 | $0.05 | -$0.15 | -$0.34 | -$0.13 | -$0.13 | $0.12 |
| Profit margin | -2.62% | -5.26% | -8.07% | -22.29% | -3.11% | -1.57% | 2.06% | -2.13% | 6.59% | -1.41% | 27.39% | 8.06% | -19.66% | -33.68% | -7.43% | -6.38% | 8.32% |
| ROE | -5.16% | -21.69% | -31.44% | -90.25% | -6.71% | -2.29% | 3.23% | -3.61% | 11.33% | -3.32% | 63.74% | 78.61% | -1242.37% | -200.92% | -23.89% | -17.44% | 19.39% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
1 methods answered, across 1 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
-73.2% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| 5.0x |
| 0.3x |
| — |
| 4.60% |
| $58.14M |
| NCEWNew Century Logistics (BVI) Ltd | $18.19 | — | 11.7x | — | -146.22% | $58.21M |
| ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd | $3.98 | 398.0x | 19.6x | — | — | $60.1M |