Loading…
Trio-tech International
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▲ +176.2% over 5Y.
today you would have $2,945.50▲ +194.5%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 4 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $6.62 | $2.90 | $2.54 | $2.25 | |
| P/E | 13.7x | — | 24.2x | 13.7x | 7.9x |
| P/S | 0.5x | 1.6x | 0.6x | 0.5x | 0.4x |
| P/B | 0.7x | 1.7x | 0.8x | 0.7x | 0.7x |
| EPS | -$0.01 |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
Square root of 22.5 × earnings × book value — the two ceilings Graham proposed. Blind to intangibles, so it undervalues software and brands.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Median P/E of 27.4 among peers in the sector.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Sector median of 13.1x operating profit, less net debt. Sees the business before its financing, so debt does not distort the comparison. Banks have no EBITDA — interest is their revenue, not a cost.
Companies of similar size in Technology, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIMDAinos, Inc. | $1.41 | — | 3.2x | — | -196.30% | $10.41M |
| AGMHAgm Group Holdings Inc | $0.94 | 2.9x | 0.1x | — | 1.89% | $4.51M |
| ALKTAlkami Technology Inc | $14.60 | — | 4.3x | — | -12.77% | $1.56B |
| ALMUAeluma, Inc. | $13.14 |
Trio-Tech International, together with its subsidiaries, offers manufacturing, testing, and distribution services to the semiconductor industry in the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and China. It operates through Manufacturing, Testing, Distribution, and Real Estate segments. The company develops and manufactures test equipment used in front-end and back-end manufacturing processes of semiconductors. It also offers equipment, which includes leak detectors, autoclaves, centrifuges, burn-in systems and boards, HAST testers, temperature-controlled chucks, and others; and develops team integrated device manufacturers and fabless semiconductor companies in the testing process. In addition, the company provides electrical, environmental, and burn-in testing services to semiconductor manufacturers in testing laboratories, and end users of semiconductors and electronic components; support the asset-light strategy of customers by setting up test facilities; and providing component level, package level and system level testing services. Further, it distributes environmental chambers, mechanical shock and vibration testers, and other semiconductor equipment; components, such as connectors, sockets, cables, LCD displays, and touch screen panels; and invests in and rents real estate properties; as well as offers value-added services. Trio-Tech International was incorporated in 1958 and is headquartered in Van Nuys, California.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| $0.12 |
| $0.19 |
| $0.29 |
| Profit margin | 3.03% | -0.11% | 2.48% | 3.57% | 5.44% |
| ROE | 4.30% | -0.12% | 3.35% | 5.25% | 8.59% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
3 methods answered, across 2 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
-65.2% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| — |
| 5.9x |
| — |
| -20.67% |
| $240.53M |
| BIRDSmartbird, Inc. | $2.54 | — | 1.3x | — | -177.98% | $22.37M |
| YYAIAirwa Inc | $0.86 | — | 0.2x | — | -19.34% | $3.96M |