TTEC Holdings, Inc.
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▼ -98.7% over 5Y.
today you would have $14.02▼ -98.6%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 18 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $3.60 | $4.99 | $21.67 | $44.13 | $90.55 | $72.93 | $39.62 | $28.57 | $40.25 | $30.50 | $27.91 | $23.68 | $23.94 | $17.80 | $16.20 | $20.59 | $20.03 |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Cash flow growing 5.0% a year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, then 2.5% forever.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Companies of similar size in Technology, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WATTEnergous Corp | $11.10 | — | 2.0x | — | -32.77% | $61.35M |
| ICGIntchains Group Ltd | $1.03 | — | 0.5x | — | -21.63% | $62.53M |
| SPWRSunPower Inc. | $0.30 | — | — | — | — | $62.64M |
| UEICUniversal Electronics Inc | $4.52 |
TTEC Holdings, Inc. operates as a customer experience (CX) company that designs, builds, and operates technology-enabled customer experiences across live interaction channels. It operates through TTEC Digital and TTEC Engage segments. The TTEC Digital segment provides CX technologies for contact center as a service, customer relationship management, and artificial intelligence (AI) and analytics; creates and implements strategic CX transformation roadmaps; sells, operates, and provides managed services for cloud platforms and premise based CX technologies; creates proprietary IP to support industry specific and custom client needs; and offers CX consulting services. The TTEC Engage segment provides digitally enabled CX operational and managed services; delivers data-driven omnichannel customer care, customer acquisition, growth and retention services, tech support, fraud mitigation, and back-office solutions; and offers solutions for AI operations, including data annotation and labeling. It serves clients in the financial services, healthcare, public sector, communication, technology, media and entertainment, travel and hospitality, automotive, and retail industries. The company operates in the United States, Canada, the Philippines, the Asia Pacific, India, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. The company was formerly known as TeleTech Holdings, Inc. and changed its name to TTEC Holdings, Inc. in May 1996. TTEC Holdings, Inc. was founded in 1982 and is headquartered in Austin, Texas.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| $8.35 |
| P/E | 22.2x | — | — | 120.4x | 20.2x | 30.5x | 28.9x | 24.0x | 37.1x | 251.6x | 43.0x | 22.2x | 16.4x | 18.6x | 14.1x | 12.7x | 25.4x | 17.9x | 7.9x |
| P/S | 1.0x | 0.1x | 0.1x | 0.4x | 0.9x | 1.9x | 1.7x | 1.1x | 0.9x | 1.2x | 1.1x | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 3.6x | 1.5x | 0.9x | 1.7x | 3.6x | 7.9x | 7.4x | 4.3x | 3.7x | 5.1x | 3.9x | — | — | — | 40.6x | 2.0x | 2.6x | 2.7x | 1.6x |
| EPS | -$3.99 | -$6.74 | $0.18 | $2.18 | $2.97 | $2.52 | $1.65 | $0.77 | $0.16 | $0.71 | $1.26 | $1.44 | $1.29 | $1.26 | $1.28 | $0.81 | $1.12 | $1.06 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | — | 1.20% | 4.80% | 2.31% | 0.99% | 3.95% | 1.56% | 1.93% | 1.17% | 1.26% | 1.29% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout | 54.23% | — | — | 577.78% | 46.79% | 30.30% | 114.29% | 37.58% | 71.43% | 293.75% | 54.23% | 28.57% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Profit margin | 2.51% | -9.01% | -14.54% | 0.34% | 4.22% | 6.20% | 6.09% | 4.69% | 2.37% | 0.49% | 2.64% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROE | 15.74% | -170.47% | -119.71% | 1.37% | 17.86% | 26.20% | 25.92% | 17.87% | 10.15% | 2.00% | 9.31% | — | — | — | 304.66% | 15.77% | 10.97% | 15.74% | 20.43% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
Dividend growing 7.3% a year against a 8.8% required return, taken from the stock’s beta. The only method anchored on what the company pays rather than what it reports.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
2 methods answered, across 2 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
+524.9% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| — |
| 0.4x |
| — |
| -10.21% |
| $58.24M |
| ODYSOdysight.ai Inc. | $3.78 | — | 3.7x | — | -72.81% | $63.53M |
| QXLQuantum X Labs Inc | $4.78 | 13.7x | 3.5x | — | -0.03% | $63.75M |