Virco Mfg Corporation
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▲ +95.8% over 5Y.
today you would have $1,952.79▲ +95.3%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 17 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $6.50 | $6.39 | $10.25 | $12.03 | $4.52 | $3.01 | $2.53 | $4.24 | $4.00 | $5.05 | $4.30 | $3.33 | $2.44 | $2.29 | $2.59 | $1.61 | $2.64 | |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Sector median of 9.8x operating profit, less net debt. Sees the business before its financing, so debt does not distort the comparison. Banks have no EBITDA — interest is their revenue, not a cost.
Companies of similar size in Consumer Cyclical, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRWGGrowGeneration Corp. | $1.58 | — | 1.0x | — | -17.07% | $93.09M |
| VNCEVince Holding Corp | $7.56 | 10.8x | 1.9x | — | 21.28% | $97.13M |
| NDLSNOODLES & Co | $14.78 | — | — | — | — | $88.16M |
| BARKBark, Inc. | $10.92 |
Virco Mfg. Corporation engages in the design, production, and distribution of furniture in the United States and Canada. The company offers seating products, including 4-leg chairs, cantilever chairs, mobile task chairs and lab stools, tablet armchairs, steel-frame and floor rockers, series stools, hard plastic seating, folding and upholstered stack chairs, and plastic stack and upholstered ergonomic chairs. It also provides activity, butcher block, folding, office, technology, mobile tables, mobile storage equipment, and student and teacher desks; desks and workstations and instructor media stations and towers; chair desks and combo units, tablet arm, mobile workstations, student desks, and returns and credenzas; and computer furniture solutions. In addition, the company provides administrative office furniture, including desks, returns, bookcases, and other items, as well as steel storage cabinets, wardrobe tower cabinets, file credenzas, and mobile pedestals; laboratory furniture comprising steel-based science tables, table bases, lab stools, and wood-frame science tables; mobile furniture, such as mobile tables, mobile cabinets, and mobile chairs for school settings and offices; and handling and storage equipment, and stackable storage trucks. It serves public and private educational institutions, charter schools, convention centers and arenas, hospitality providers, government facilities, and places of worship through its sales and support teams, and dealers' network. Virco Mfg. Corporation was founded in 1950 and is headquartered in Torrance, California.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| P/E |
| 13.1x |
| 40.6x |
| 4.8x |
| 7.6x |
| 11.8x |
| — |
| — |
| 16.9x |
| — |
| — |
| 3.4x |
| 14.3x |
| 55.5x |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| P/S | 0.3x | 0.5x | 0.4x | 0.6x | 0.8x | 0.4x | 0.3x | 0.2x | 0.3x | 0.3x | 0.4x | 0.4x | 0.3x | 0.2x | 0.2x | 0.2x | 0.1x | 0.2x |
| P/B | 1.2x | 1.0x | 0.9x | 1.8x | 2.9x | 1.5x | 0.9x | 0.7x | 1.2x | 1.0x | 1.3x | 1.9x | 2.2x | 1.3x | 1.2x | 1.2x | 0.5x | 0.5x |
| EPS | $0.16 | $1.32 | $1.34 | $1.02 | -$0.95 | -$0.14 | $0.15 | -$0.10 | -$0.21 | $1.49 | $0.30 | $0.06 | -$0.12 | -$0.27 | -$0.97 | -$1.25 | -$0.05 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 0.77% | 1.56% | 0.88% | 0.17% | — | — | — | — | 1.50% | 0.30% | — | — | — | — | — | 3.11% | 3.79% |
| Payout | 6.72% | 31.25% | 7.58% | 6.72% | 1.96% | — | — | — | — | — | 1.01% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Profit margin | -0.38% | 1.29% | 8.13% | 8.14% | 7.16% | -8.19% | -1.46% | 1.23% | -0.80% | -1.70% | 13.12% | 2.70% | 0.52% | -1.12% | -2.43% | -8.29% | -9.72% | -0.38% |
| ROE | -1.05% | 2.42% | 19.81% | 24.03% | 24.31% | -31.90% | -4.12% | 4.35% | -2.83% | -5.47% | 38.35% | 13.66% | 3.76% | -6.27% | -14.17% | -44.68% | -34.91% | -1.05% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
Dividend growing 2.8% a year against a 7.0% required return, taken from the stock’s beta. The only method anchored on what the company pays rather than what it reports.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
2 methods answered, across 2 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
-22.0% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| — |
| 1.3x |
| — |
| -36.70% |
| $98.65M |
| LAKELakeland Industries Inc | $10.23 | — | 0.8x | — | -19.62% | $101.55M |
| PUSAAureus Greenway Holdings Inc | $3.78 | — | 2.2x | — | -17.20% | $101.85M |