VerifyMe, Inc.
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▼ -71.4% over 5Y.
today you would have $282.32▼ -71.8%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 26 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $0.60 | $1.36 | $1.12 | $1.16 | $3.17 | $3.60 | $3.49 | $10.98 | $13.50 |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Cash flow growing 5.0% a year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, then 2.5% forever.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Companies of similar size in Industrials, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMAPMA Graphene Technology Group Inc. | $1.16 | — | — | — | — | $8.09M |
| MTENMingteng International Corp Inc. | $1.05 | — | 0.0x | — | -11.72% | $8.03M |
| SGLYSingularity Future Technology Ltd. | $1.47 | — | 0.1x | — | -67.85% | $7.94M |
| ELOGEastern International Ltd. |
VerifyMe, Inc. offers brand protection and precision logistics solutions. The company offers predictive analytics for optimizing delivery of time and temperature sensitive perishable products. It also operates PeriTrack customer dashboard, an integrated web portal tool that gives its customers an in-depth look at their shipping activities based on real-time data. In addition, it provides service center, pre-transit, post-delivery, and weather/traffic services; and anti-counterfeit and brand protection services. The company was formerly known as LaserLock Technologies, Inc. and changed its name to VerifyMe, Inc. in July 2015. VerifyMe, Inc. was incorporated in 1999 and is headquartered in Lake Mary, Florida.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| $5.50 |
| $125.00 |
| $88.82 |
| $302.17 |
| $125.38 |
| $340.00 |
| $34.00 |
| $42.50 |
| $2.97 |
| $25.50 |
| $106.25 |
| $148.75 |
| $403.75 |
| $892.50 |
| $807.50 |
| $1,487.50 |
| $1,062.50 |
| P/E | — | — | — | — | — | 6.5x | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.0x | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S | 32.1x | 0.5x | 0.7x | 0.4x | 0.6x | 26.6x | 77.2x | 32.1x | 304.7x | — | 26.7x | 75.8x | 51.6x | 6636.0x | 399.5x | 1307.0x | 23.1x | 68.1x | 0.8x | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 1.1x | 0.7x | 1.6x | 0.9x | 0.8x | 1.1x | 3.2x | — | 14.5x | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS | -$0.39 | -$0.37 | -$0.35 | -$1.70 | $0.49 | -$1.48 | -$1.17 | -$1.50 | -$7.00 | -$12.00 | -$23.50 | -$111.00 | -$297.50 | $42.50 | $0.00 | -$42.50 | -$42.50 | -$42.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Profit margin | -1436.45% | -29.91% | -15.80% | -13.39% | -73.55% | 416.61% | -1720.70% | -1023.27% | -3916.01% | — | -4442.73% | -1059.47% | -6355.23% | -522002.20% | -7041.26% | -7486.64% | -1343.66% | -3656.65% | -1436.45% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROE | -87.05% | -44.62% | -37.44% | -27.05% | -105.98% | 17.06% | -70.95% | — | -186.78% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -180.17% | -145.66% | -442.85% | -103.15% | -55.27% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
1 methods answered, across 1 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
+61.9% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| $0.70 |
| — |
| 0.6x |
| — |
| -8.64% |
| $8.99M |
| CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd | $0.66 | — | 0.2x | — | -41.04% | $9.01M |
| CRECre8 Enterprise Ltd | $3.91 | 16.3x | 1.2x | — | 17.21% | $7.87M |