Loading…
Canterbury Park Holding Corp
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
None of the investors we track reported a position in CPHC.
▼ -0.1% over 5Y.
today you would have $1,057.94▲ +5.8%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 11 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $15.40 | $20.50 | $20.43 | $31.26 | $17.28 | $11.97 | $12.40 | $13.91 | $16.25 | $10.05 | $10.25 | |
| P/E | 16.7x | — | 48.8x | 9.6x | 20.3x | 7.1x | 52.0x | 21.0x | 11.0x | 17.5x | 10.4x |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
Square root of 22.5 × earnings × book value — the two ceilings Graham proposed. Blind to intangibles, so it undervalues software and brands.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Cash flow growing 15.0% a year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, then 2.5% forever.
Sector median of 9.8x operating profit, less net debt. Sees the business before its financing, so debt does not distort the comparison. Banks have no EBITDA — interest is their revenue, not a cost.
Companies of similar size in Consumer Cyclical, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMPDEmpery Digital Inc. | $2.98 | 3.7x | 0.7x | — | -426.73% | $83.92M |
| MWCMicware Co., Ltd. | $1.42 | 8.9x | 1.6x | — | 21.69% | $84.38M |
| NPTTexxon Holding Ltd | $3.53 | — | 17.5x | — | -10.27% | $78.31M |
| NDLSNOODLES & Co | $14.78 |
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in horse racing, casino, food and beverage, and real estate development businesses. The company operates year-round simulcasting of horse races, as well as wagering on live thoroughbred and quarter horse races on a seasonal basis. It offers unbanked card games, such as poker and table games. In addition, the company is involved in the operation of concession stands, restaurants and buffets, bars, and other food venues; café style restaurants and full-service bars within the Casino and simulcast area; lounge services along with a buffet restaurant; various concession style food and beverages during live racing; and catering and events services. Further, it engages in development opportunities, such as residential development, office, restaurants, hotel, entertainment, and retail operations. The company is also involved in the related services and activities, such as parking, advertising signage, publication sales, and other entertainment events and activities. The company was formerly known as New Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and changed its name to Canterbury Park Holding Corporation in June 2016. Canterbury Park Holding Corporation was incorporated in 1994 and is based in Shakopee, Minnesota.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| 16.0x |
| P/S | 1.3x | 1.3x | 1.7x | 1.7x | 2.3x | 1.4x | 1.7x | 1.0x | 1.1x | 1.3x | 0.8x | 0.8x |
| P/B | 1.2x | 0.9x | 1.2x | 1.2x | 2.2x | 1.3x | 1.1x | 1.2x | 1.4x | 1.8x | 1.2x | 1.3x |
| EPS | -$0.10 | $0.42 | $2.13 | $1.54 | $2.44 | $0.23 | $0.59 | $1.26 | $0.93 | $0.97 | $0.64 |
| Dividend yield | 1.82% | 1.82% | 1.37% | 1.37% | 1.12% | — | — | 2.26% | 2.01% | 1.42% | 3.48% | 2.44% |
| Payout | 30.41% | — | 66.67% | 13.15% | 22.73% | — | — | 47.46% | 22.22% | 24.73% | 36.08% | 39.06% |
| Profit margin | 7.18% | -0.89% | 3.43% | 17.19% | 11.24% | 19.53% | 3.20% | 4.59% | 9.67% | 7.18% | 8.00% | 5.22% |
| ROE | 10.05% | -0.63% | 2.51% | 12.91% | 10.55% | 18.33% | 2.07% | 5.50% | 12.24% | 10.05% | 11.48% | 8.24% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
Dividend growing 2.5% a year against a 9.0% required return, taken from the stock’s beta. The only method anchored on what the company pays rather than what it reports.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
4 methods answered, across 4 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
-12.6% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| $88.16M |
| INTGIntergroup Corp | $35.40 | — | — | — | — | $76.07M |
| FLLFull House Resorts Inc | $2.06 | — | — | — | -936.37% | $75.49M |