Loading…
SHENGFENG DEVELOPMENT Ltd
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
None of the investors we track reported a position in SFWL.
▲ +133.1% over 5Y.
This stock has less than 5 years of price history — the answer would measure a shorter period than the one asked for.
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 3 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $14.25 | $1.08 | $2.94 | |
| P/E | — | — | 8.3x | 22.6x |
| P/S | 0.6x | 2.1x | 0.2x | 0.6x |
| P/B | 2.2x | 8.9x | 0.8x | 2.2x |
| EPS | — | $0.13 | $0.13 | |
| Profit margin | 2.16% |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
Square root of 22.5 × earnings × book value — the two ceilings Graham proposed. Blind to intangibles, so it undervalues software and brands.
Earnings growing 17.3% a year plus a 0.0% dividend — Lynch adds the yield to the growth rate, so a payer is not priced like a company that returns nothing. Growth capped at 25%.
Median P/E of 24.8 among peers in the sector.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Sector median of 12.6x operating profit, less net debt. Sees the business before its financing, so debt does not distort the comparison. Banks have no EBITDA — interest is their revenue, not a cost.
Companies of similar size in Industrials, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLBSGlobus Maritime Ltd | $3.54 | 11.4x | 0.4x | — | 3.80% | $76.4M |
| LASELaser Photonics Corp | $1.46 | — | — | — | -1180.95% | $73.26M |
| BLNKBlink Charging Co. | $0.53 | — | 1.6x | — | -85.48% | $77.18M |
| WATRAir Water Ventures Ltd | $2.32 |
Shengfeng Development Limited, through its subsidiaries, provides contract logistics services in the People's Republic of China. The company offers business-to-business freight transportation services, such as full truckload and less than truckload; and cloud storage services, including warehouse management, pick and pack, order fulfillment, kitting and assembly, delivery process management, in-warehouse processing, and inventory optimization management services. It also provides value-added services comprising collection on delivery, customs declaration, delivery upstairs, packaging, pay-at-arrival, return proof of delivery, and shipment protection; and software engineering, supply chain management, and technical and development services; inbound, outbound, and reverse logistics; and line-haul and short-haul distribution services. The company serves clients in various industries, including manufacturing, new energy, telecommunications, internet, fashion, fast moving consumer goods, publishing, agriculture, and e-commerce. Shengfeng Development Limited was founded in 2001 and is based in Fuzhou, the People's Republic of China.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| 2.08% |
| 2.16% |
| 2.55% |
| ROE | 9.29% | 9.04% | 9.29% | 9.54% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
4 methods answered, across 2 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
+246.2% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| $72.5M |
| CVUCpi Aerostructures Inc | $5.41 | 18.7x | 2.5x | — | 14.37% | $71.68M |
| MOBMobilicom Ltd | $5.54 | — | 6.2x | — | -374.88% | $71.29M |