Siebert Financial Corp
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
▼ -30.6% over 5Y.
today you would have $656.72▼ -34.3%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 16 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $3.51 | $3.16 | $1.68 | $1.36 | $2.32 | $4.20 | $8.65 | $14.46 | $13.50 | $2.98 | $1.29 | $2.20 | $1.61 | $1.67 | $1.43 | $1.72 | |
| P/E | 14.5x |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Cash flow growing 5.4% a year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, then 2.5% forever.
Sector median of 11.2x operating profit, less net debt. Sees the business before its financing, so debt does not distort the comparison. Banks have no EBITDA — interest is their revenue, not a cost.
Companies of similar size in Financial Services, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORIQOrigin Investment Corp I | $10.39 | 43.3x | 86.6x | — | — | $89.61M |
| MMTXMiluna Acquisition Corp | $10.18 | — | — | — | — | $89.87M |
| SIMASIM Acquisition Corp. I | $10.95 | 45.6x | — | — | — | $90M |
| UBCPUnited Bancorp Inc | $15.71 |
Siebert Financial Corp., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the provision of brokerage and financial advisory services in the United States. It offers self-directed trading, market making and fixed income investment, stock borrow/stock loan, equity compensation plans, and wealth management/financial advisory; Investment banking / capital markets; and advanced trading services; corporate services; independent retail execution services; and retail customer services. The company also offers self-directed retirement accounts, as well as lends customers a portion of the market value of marginable securities held in the customer's account. In addition, the company provides data technology platform that offers various services, such as email and messaging, market data systems and third-party trading systems, business productivity tools, and customer relationship management systems. Further, it offers a robo-advisory technology that provides clients with an automated wealth management solution, as well as managed portfolios and separately managed accounts; and various insurance products, such as fixed annuities, personal insurance, property and casualty insurance, natural disaster insurance, and life and disability, as well as talent management and representation, sports negotiation, and marketing services. It has a strategic partnership with FusionIQ. Siebert Financial Corp. was incorporated in 1934 and is headquartered in Miami Beach, Florida.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| 27.0x |
| 9.6x |
| 8.0x |
| — |
| 14.5x |
| 42.0x |
| 78.6x |
| 32.9x |
| 135.0x |
| — |
| 9.9x |
| 7.3x |
| 6.0x |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| P/S | 2.2x | 1.5x | 1.5x | 0.9x | 0.9x | 1.1x | 2.4x | 6.2x | 13.1x | 28.0x | 6.7x | 2.8x | 3.1x | 2.2x | 1.8x | 1.6x | — |
| P/B | 1.6x | 1.6x | 1.5x | 1.0x | 0.9x | 1.5x | 3.5x | 8.0x | 22.9x | 70.3x | 29.2x | 1.8x | 2.6x | 1.4x | 1.2x | 1.0x | — |
| EPS | $0.13 | $0.33 | $0.21 | -$0.06 | $0.16 | $0.10 | $0.11 | $0.44 | $0.10 | -$0.25 | $0.13 | $0.30 | $0.27 | -$0.01 | -$0.24 | -$0.12 |
| Dividend yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.71% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Profit margin | 2.30% | 5.44% | 15.86% | 10.94% | -3.97% | 7.50% | 5.42% | 7.56% | 39.83% | 16.45% | -56.85% | -28.42% | -41.36% | -36.05% | -0.81% | -26.63% | -12.71% |
| ROE | 2.60% | 5.74% | 15.82% | 11.22% | -4.07% | 10.28% | 7.83% | 9.77% | 69.65% | 41.39% | -247.58% | -18.29% | -35.34% | -23.55% | -0.55% | -17.23% | -7.21% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
Dividend growing 0.0% a year against a 8.7% required return, taken from the stock’s beta. The only method anchored on what the company pays rather than what it reports.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
3 methods answered, across 3 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
+42.4% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| 11.4x |
| 1.3x |
| 5.03% |
| 12.10% |
| $90.1M |
| FUSBFirst US Bancshares Inc | $16.38 | 12.4x | 0.9x | 1.71% | 7.53% | $90.17M |
| SRLScully Royalty Ltd. | $5.84 | — | 0.4x | — | -0.67% | $88.92M |