Loading…
Yunhong Green Cti Ltd
How the company evolved, year by year. Revenue and debt come from the annual reports — for most companies, the 10-K filings with the SEC since 2009; dividends from the payments themselves.
The bars are a balance on the closing date; the lines are what happened during the year. Revenue above equity is ordinary, not an anomaly — it means the company turns its capital over more than once a year.
Major managers that reported this stock in their latest 13F.
None of the investors we track reported a position in YHGJ.
▼ -87.7% over 5Y.
today you would have $125.77▼ -87.4%
Dividends reinvested, splits accounted for. Past prices say what happened, not what will.
The last 16 closed years. Each multiple uses that year’s closing price and that year’s reported numbers — not today’s. The range is set by the annual reports on record.
| Indicator | Median | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end price | $3.63 | $5.50 | $21.40 | $10.40 | $11.90 | $17.20 | $8.40 | $30.90 | $40.70 | $58.50 | $51.10 | $37.60 | $58.40 | $51.60 | $43.80 | $60.00 | |
| P/E | 29.2x |
Seven formulas applied to what the company reported. None of them predicts a price — each answers what the stock would be worth if its assumption held. The assumption is printed next to every number, because it is the assumption that produces the result.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
This formula has no meaning here — usually a loss, negative cash flow, or a missing input.
Companies of similar size in Consumer Cyclical, for comparison. The columns are the same ones above, in the same order.
| Stock | Price | P/E | P/B | Dividend yield | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRMMedirom Healthcare Technologies Inc. | $0.95 | 2.6x | 4.9x | — | 53.19% | $7.51M |
| CGTLCreative Global Technology Holdings Ltd | $4.26 | — | 0.4x | — | -84.89% | $7.31M |
| TKLFTokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. | $1.69 | 8.4x | 0.2x | 14.20% | 1.55% | $7.15M |
| UZXLinkage Global Inc |
Yunhong Green CTI Ltd. develops, produces, distributes, and sells consumer products in the United States and internationally. The company offers novelty products, including foil and latex balloons, and related gift items; and inflatable latex items, which include punch balls, water bombs, and balloons twisted into shapes, and other specialty designs. It also provides flexible films for food, and other commercial and packaging applications, as well as assembles and sells Candy Blossom product line. The company serves various retail outlets, including general merchandise stores, discount and drugstore chains, grocery chains, card and gift shops, party goods stores, and florists and balloon decorators. It sells its products directly, as well as through a network of distributors and wholesalers, retail chains, and independent sales representatives. The company was formerly known as Yunhong CTI Ltd. and changed its name to Yunhong Green CTI Ltd. in August 2023. Yunhong Green CTI Ltd. was incorporated in 1983 and is headquartered in Lake Barrington, Illinois.
Company description provided by Yahoo Finance.
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 32.5x |
| 17.0x |
| 25.1x |
| 53.1x |
| 172.0x |
| 29.2x |
| 10.0x |
| P/S | 0.3x | 0.5x | 0.8x | 2.5x | 1.2x | 0.3x | 0.5x | 0.1x | 0.2x | 0.3x | 0.3x | 0.3x | 0.2x | 0.3x | 0.3x | 0.3x | 0.4x |
| P/B | 1.5x | 1.1x | 1.3x | 11.9x | 7.6x | 1.7x | 8.5x | 1.9x | 1.6x | 1.3x | 1.6x | 1.3x | 1.0x | 1.5x | 1.4x | 1.2x | 1.4x |
| EPS | -$1.01 | -$0.07 | -$0.10 | -$2.20 | -$20.10 | -$15.20 | -$18.60 | -$10.00 | -$4.40 | $1.80 | $3.00 | $1.50 | $1.10 | $0.30 | $1.50 | $6.00 |
| Dividend yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.14% | 1.67% |
| Payout | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.33% | 16.67% |
| Profit margin | -2.08% | -12.84% | -8.35% | -1.32% | -8.13% | -34.34% | -21.06% | -22.09% | -7.26% | -2.85% | 1.09% | 1.76% | 0.89% | 0.67% | 0.21% | 1.03% | 3.83% |
| ROE | -10.15% | -29.57% | -14.01% | -6.30% | -53.42% | -204.20% | -373.46% | -359.36% | -48.93% | -14.08% | 5.50% | 8.19% | 3.99% | 2.97% | 0.83% | 4.08% | 15.51% |
Median, not average: a single year of near-zero profit produces a P/E of 400 and would drag an average on its own. P/E years above 200x are left out, the same cut the fair price uses — so this median matches the “its own history” method below. Price and EPS have no median: they are series that grow.
Dividend growing 0.0% a year against a 7.0% required return, taken from the stock’s beta. The only method anchored on what the company pays rather than what it reports.
Not the average of the seven numbers above. Four of the seven start from the same earnings per share — Graham, Lynch, sector multiples and its own history — so averaging all seven would let one input count four times and drown out the others. Instead each family produces one number, and the fair price is the average of the families that answered. A family with two working formulas contributes their average, not two votes.
1 methods answered, across 1 families.
Every formula reads the same reported statements and they can be wrong together. The margin is room for that.
+144.6% from the average.
These are models, not forecasts, and not investment advice. Change one assumption and the number changes with it — that is a property of valuation, not a defect of this page.
| $0.12 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| -51.39% |
| $8.2M |
| BQBoqii Holding Ltd | $0.96 | — | 0.2x | — | -0.92% | $7.06M |
| ATERAterian, Inc. | $0.39 | — | 0.3x | — | -104.03% | $7.03M |